Capability score
0 to 100, banded against the live global cohort. How mature the organisation is across six dimensions of AI capability.
The Global AI Adoption Benchmark™ establishes that baseline by measuring AI capability, workforce sentiment, and operational avoidance across the enterprise, benchmarked against the global cohort.
Free · ~5 minutes · Report delivered by email
If these questions cannot be answered with evidence, governance is being applied to assumptions rather than operational reality.
The Enterprise Benchmark expands the GAAB so every Executive, every Department Lead, and every Individual Team Member in scope completes the instrument each quarter. The board receives a continuously refreshed reading of AI capability, sentiment, and avoidance across the whole organisation, on the same scale as the global cohort.
0 to 100, banded against the live global cohort. How mature the organisation is across six dimensions of AI capability.
0 to 100, in two facets: propensity to innovate, and maturity to do so safely. The leading indicator most boards do not have.
Where AI is being deliberately avoided, by whom, and for what reason. The intervention is in the reason, not the percentage.
The instrument, the six dimensions, and full standards alignment.
Equally weighted at one-sixth of the composite. Engineered to align with the functional structure of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and to cover the seven trustworthy characteristics.
Every scored question carries five reference tags. The aggregate is a board-ready disclosure profile across the international standards your auditors and regulators are already using.
The Executive Team, every Department Lead, and every Individual Team Member answer the questions only their layer can credibly answer. Where the layers agree, the score is reliable. Where they disagree, the disagreement is the diagnostic.
Capability moves slowly; sentiment moves first. The Quarterly Pulse gives the leadership team a 90-day early warning system the rest of the dashboard cannot give them.
Most assessments ignore deliberate non-use. Two organisations with the same capability score and the same sentiment can have radically different avoidance profiles, and the reason mix indicates the right intervention: access, training, ethics, or fear.
The Board Report is engineered to feed the Inaix AI Governance Framework or an existing AIMS programme. It is the first layer of the system, not another report.
The benchmark reveals where AI capability is already concentrated within the organisation, identifies individuals accelerating adoption and internal innovation, and surfaces hidden risk patterns that conventional governance processes often fail to detect.
CEO, CFO, COO, CTO, CHRO, Chairman, Board Directors, and other C-suite leaders complete the instrument to anchor strategic intent and accountability.
Marketing, Finance, Commercial, Product, Distribution, Operations, Technology, People, Risk, and Legal heads respond to surface operational reality.
Identify and engage AI leaders within teams to initiate adoption, share practice, and assist the wider organisation.
Repeat each quarter to monitor progress, surface risk, and track the AI adoption trajectory across the organisation.
Get a real-time pulse on how AI adoption is progressing across the organisation, surface risks, identify opportunities, and future-proof your business.